Hammers1993 1:28 Fri May 13
Nathan Redmond
|
|
Of all the teams relegated he is probably the only player I would consider signing.
Does anybody know of any Norwich fans who see him week in week out and can give more insight as to why he doesn't play more regularly?
Injuries or just bad attitude?
Every time I have seen him I have always thought he would be an excellent signing for us, one of the positions we really need someone claiming and this guy on his day (from what I've seen) is mustard.
Obviously is a bit worrying why he doesn't feature more regularly and wondered if anyone knew the reason?
|
|
|
Replies - In Chronological Order ( Show Newest Messages First)
slackerdan
1:31 Fri May 13
Re: Nathan Redmond
|
Yes, I know plenty of Norwich supporters, and they all moan about his lack of consistency. Goal ratio is less than 1 in 8. He does always seem to play a blinder against us though!
|
BetterthanKaka
1:33 Fri May 13
Re: Nathan Redmond
|
Very inconsistent.
I wouldn't take any of the relegated players. Need to be looking at better than that now.
|
Eggbert Nobacon
1:37 Fri May 13
Re: Nathan Redmond
|
linked yesterday
https://www.theguardian.com/football/2016/may/12/crystal-palace-stoke-city-west-ham-norwich-winger-nathan-redmond
Decent enough back up, can't see him pressing Antonio, Lanzini and Payet for a starting role though
|
connolly8
1:39 Fri May 13
Re: Nathan Redmond
|
Andros Townsend is better.
|
hornchurchsteve
1:39 Fri May 13
Re: Nathan Redmond
|
We can do better than him that's for sure. Very average,
|
Spandex Sidney
1:40 Fri May 13
Re: Nathan Redmond
|
What goal ratio is good in a relegated team in the top division in English football for a WINGER then?!
|
Bullet
1:41 Fri May 13
Re: Nathan Redmond
|
No thanks, we need consistent players.
|
Rossal
1:41 Fri May 13
Re: Nathan Redmond
|
Overated because he in english
Had two premier league seasons and not produced in either
22 now aswell so running out of time to be considered a 'prospect'
We should be aiming higher
|
crystal falace
1:46 Fri May 13
Re: Nathan Redmond
|
if you would rather have him than wijnaldum then there is something wrong
|
Alex V
1:49 Fri May 13
Re: Nathan Redmond
|
I think he's a promising player, but we'd be paying over the odds. Poor target.
|
dealcanvey
2:12 Fri May 13
Re: Nathan Redmond
|
Year left on his contract. Could go cheap. Good replacement for Moses?
|
dealcanvey
2:14 Fri May 13
Re: Nathan Redmond
|
Spandex Sidney 1:40 Fri May 13
I agree.
Matt Jarvis had a great goals per game ratio for a winger when wolves were relegated and he come here.
Still did not save him from mass slaughter!
|
Alex V
2:22 Fri May 13
Re: Nathan Redmond
|
Good spot on the contract. Maybe he does become affordable, though maybe also makes there be less benefit to Norwich in selling him if the price is low. They could keep him to help them get promoted, with the hope that he would sign a new deal in the process.
|
w4hammer
2:24 Fri May 13
Re: Nathan Redmond
|
they are saying he could go for as low as £8M - at that price id say yes please- Ive always rated him
|
dicksie3
2:38 Fri May 13
Re: Nathan Redmond
|
Townsend, please, from Newcastle United.
|
slackerdan
3:14 Fri May 13
Re: Nathan Redmond
|
I take your point Spandex, but that goal ratio wasn't for this season alone - it's based on his total career stats, so includes Championship too.
|
cholo
3:30 Fri May 13
Re: Nathan Redmond
|
He's not a regular in a relegated team for a reason, steer clear, could probably do with establishing himself in the first team he's already at before stepping up, the championship might do him good.
|
Trevor B
3:44 Fri May 13
Re: Nathan Redmond
|
cholo
he has had two injuries this seasons that kept him out for several games each time. stats are worthless without the ability to interpret them with common sense.
|
Lee Trundle
3:51 Fri May 13
Re: Nathan Redmond
|
Even with his injuries, he's still been involved in 34 out of 37 games this season. More than Adrian has for us.
Not bad for someone who isn't a regular.
|
| 
